Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  507 656 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 507 656 Next Page
Page Background

Platinum Priority – Editorial

Referring to the article published on pp. 499–506 of this issue

Adjunct Screening of

NKX3.1

Expression Supports 5

a

-Reductase

Inhibition Intervention in Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance

Joy C. Yang, Christopher P. Evans

*

Department of Urology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA

Advances in sequencing techniques have propelled preci-

sion medicine in cancer treatments in the past decade.

Identification of gene mutations and deletions in cancer

patients benefit targeted therapies for various cancer types

[1]

. For instance, treating lung cancer patients harboring the

epidermal growth factor receptor mutation

[2]

with

gefitinib (Irresa) provides the greatest benefit for overall

survival and quality of life. The heterogeneity of prostate

cancer (PCa) has not historically yielded single precision

medicine interventions for PCa patients

[3]

. However, an

example of how the field is changing is the recent

observation that treatment of patients who had defects in

DNA repair genes with the PARP inhibitor olaparib resulted

in a significant response rate

[4]

.

In this issue of

European Urology

, Dutta et al

[5]

demonstrated a co-clinical approach for precision medicine

in PCa treatment. They performed RNA sequencing analyses

for

NKx3.1

wild-type and mutant mice and two cohorts of

PCa patients treated with 5

a

-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs;

finasteride and dutasteride). Using gene set enrichment

analysis (GSEA), the authors found that pathways respond-

ing to finasteride showed sharp differentiation between

Nkx3.1

+/+

and

Nkx3.1

/

mice. With assumptive matching of

patients with low NKX3.1 expression to

Nkx3.1

/

mice and

those with high NKX3.1 expression to

Nkx3.1

+/+

mice, they

performed cross-species GSEA comparing biological path-

ways affected by the 5-ARIs treatments. Strong conserva-

tion of the response for similar

NKx3.1

expression levels was

consistently observed in human and mouse counterparts.

With this confirmation, cross-species comparison identified

a 5-ARI response signature in patients with low

NKx3.1

from

the 5-ARI–treated patient cohort. Ten master regulators

(MRs) were chosen from this signature. Conservation of the

5-ARI–responsive MR signature was validated through a

cross-species GSEA comparison. Patients with low MR

activities exhibited better biochemical recurrence–free

survival over time. The authors therefore suggested that

determination of

NKX3.1

levels in PCa patients on active

surveillance may guide appropriate 5-ARI intervention.

Furthermore, a co-clinical approach with gene analysis

might provide long-term benefit for cancer prevention and

treatment interventions.

The

NKX3.1

homeobox gene is located on chromosome

8p21, a region frequently deleted in PCa. Among PCa

genomics data sets in cBioPortal, there was 3–15% deletion

of NKx3.1 in PCa patients

[6,7]

. In mouse models, loss of

Nkx3.1

impairs prostate differentiation and, when coupled

with loss of

Pten

, leads to invasive and metastatic prostate

adenocarcinoma, which might be due to defects in stem cell

regeneration

[8–10]

.

NKx3.1

is therefore considered a tumor

suppressor like

Pten

, and loss of this gene might correlate

with disease initiation and progression. Although there

were good outcomes in clinical trials using 5-ARI treat-

ments for PCa prevention or prevention of disease

progression, the improvements did not result in approvals.

Currently, 5-ARIs are approved for treatment of benign

prostatic hyperplasia. Patients with low or no

NKX3.1

expression might be primed to develop more aggressive

cancer. It might also be advantageous to examine PTEN

status in these patients to help in disease prediction. In this

study the sample size was low, with only 24 patients in total

from two cohorts. In-depth sequencing of patient biopsy

samples will be necessary to support the proposition for

5-ARI intervention during active surveillance. At issue may

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 5 0 7 – 5 0 8

ava ilable at

www.sciencedirect.com

journal homepage:

www.eu ropeanurology.com

DOI of original article:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.031

.

* Corresponding author. Department of Urology, University of California, Davis, 4860 Y Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA. Tel. +1 916 7347520;

Fax: +1 916 7348094.

E-mail address:

cpevans@ucdavis.edu

(C.P. Evans).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.019

0302-2838/

#

2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.