Interestingly, using whole-genome sequencing and bioin-
formatics analyses for subclonality, our group showed that
IDC and the adjacent glandular adenocarcinoma share an
original clonal ancestry before independent branching into
molecular subspecies
( Fig. 1B)
[9]. This suggests that the
occurrence and aggression of IDC are likely to be driven by a
series of genomic and epigenomic alterations in the prostate
gland during early tumorigenesis. If true, this would suggest
a novel model of prostate oncogenesis, whereby progression
from low- to high-risk disease in IDC-associated tumors may
not follow a linear sequential model, but may rather involve
a more acute change in evolutionary trajectory. That is
certainly the observation in
BRCA2
-mutant prostate cancers
harboring IDC, in which the early phase of tumor develop-
ment is uniquely characterized by enrichment of genetic and
epigenetic alterations in
MED12
and
MED12L
[9]. Important-
ly, these mutational events may explain the incremental
adverse prognosis conferred by IDC-positive compared to
IDC-negative
BRCA2
-mutant tumors
[10].
In conclusion, Porter and colleagues have completed a
comprehensive review of the literature and provided us
with insights into the prevalence and potential clinical
implications of IDC in prostate cancer. These clinical data
emphasize the need to understand the biological bases for
IDC-CA aggression and possible field defects within the
prostate during oncogenesis. Future large-scale molecular
genetics studies will help to affirm the ‘‘ominous’’ nature of
this subpathology, and may underpin new approaches for
surveillance using modern imaging (eg, positron emission
tomography, functional magnetic resonance imaging), and
intensified treatment with novel therapies to improve cure
rates in men with IDC-CA prostate cancers.
Conflicts of interest:
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Acknowledgments:
The authors gratefully thank the Princess Margaret
Cancer Centre Foundation and the Radiation Medicine Program
Academic Enrichment Fund for support (to R.G.B.). Robert G. Bristow
is the recipient of a Canadian Cancer Society research scientist award.
Melvin L.K. Chua is supported by a National Medical Research Council of
Singapore transition award.
References
[1]
Rhamy RK, Buchanan RD, Spalding MJ. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate gland. J Urol 1973;109:457–60.[2]
Tsuzuki T. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: a comprehensive and updated review. Int J Urol 2015;22:140–5.[3]
Kovi J, Jackson MA, Heshmat MY. Ductal spread in prostatic carci- noma. Cancer 1985;56:1566–73.[4]
Bostwick DG, Brawer MK. Prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia and early invasion in prostate cancer. Cancer 1987;59:788–94.
[5]
Kweldam CF, Ku¨mmerlin IP, Nieboer D, et al. Disease-specific survival of patients with invasive cribriform and intraductal pros- tate cancer at diagnostic biopsy. Mod Pathol 2016;29:630–6.[6]
Porter LH, Lawrence MG, Ilic D, et al. Systematic review links the prevalence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate to prostate cancer risk categories. Eur Urol 2017;72:492–5.[7] Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Briers E, et al. EAU-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG
guidelines on prostate cancer. Arnhem, The Netherlands: European
Association of Urology.
https://uroweb.org/guideline/ prostate-cancer/.
[8]
Lindberg J, Kristiansen A, Wiklund P, Gro¨nberg H, Egevad L. Tracking the origin of metastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2015;67:819–22.[9]
Taylor RA, Fraser M, Livingstone J, et al. Germline BRCA2 mutations drive prostate cancers with distinct evolutionary trajectories. Nat Commun 2017;8:13671.[10]
Risbridger GP, Taylor RA, Clouston D, et al. Patient-derived xeno- grafts reveal that intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is a promi- nent pathology in BRCA2 mutation carriers with prostate cancer and correlates with poor prognosis. Eur Urol 2015;67:496–503.E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 4 9 6 – 4 9 8
498




