Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  500 656 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 500 656 Next Page
Page Background

1.

Introduction

Widespread screening combined with the rise in the aging

population has led to increased diagnosis of prostate cancer

(PCa), but the majority of men diagnosed are at low risk

[14_TD$DIFF]

for

disease progression

[1,2]

. Rather than undergoing invasive

procedures, many men are opting for active surveillance,

whereby treatment is delayed until signs of overt progres-

sion

[2,3]

. It would be advantageous to better understand

the risk of disease progression at the individual patient level

and to identify molecular features predictive of response for

specific interventions, which is the premise of precision

cancer prevention

[4]

.

Because of the critical dependence of PCa on the androgen

receptor (AR)

[5,6]

, many interventions for PCa target AR

signaling or androgen biosynthesis

[7] .

Among these are

agents that target 5

a

-reductase, which catalyzes the

conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone (DHT)

[8] .

Although 5

a

-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs), including

finasteride and dutasteride, have been evaluated in pro-

spective clinical trials for both primary prevention

[9–12]

and secondary prevention for patients on active surveillance

[13,14] ,

their benefits in these settings remain controversial.

We performed co-clinical analyses to evaluate the

phenotypic and molecular consequences of finasteride

treatment in a genetically engineered mouse model

(GEMM) that is analogous to low-risk PCa in humans

[15,16]

. Using cross-species computational analyses to

compare finasteride treatment of GEMMs with retrospec-

tive cohorts of 5-ARI–treated patients, we show that

reduced expression of

NKX3.1

is a predictor of response

to 5-ARIs. We propose that expression of

NKX3.1

be

evaluated as a means of stratifying men on active

surveillance as candidates for intervention with 5-ARIs.

2.

Patients and methods

2.1.

Preclinical analyses

Experiments using animals were performed according to protocols

approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at

Columbia University Medical Center.

Nkx3.1

wild-type (

Nkx3.1

+/+

[1_TD$DIFF]

) and

germline homozygous mutant (

Nkx3.1

/

) mice, and

Pten

germline

heterozygous mutant mice (

Pten

+/

) have been described previously

[16,17]

. Finasteride (Kemprotec, Carnforth, UK) was dissolved in ethanol

at a concentration of 20 mg/ml and diluted using sterile phosphate-

buffered saline to a working stock of 1 mg/ml. Cohorts of mice were

randomly assigned to treatment with finasteride or vehicle. At sacrifice,

prostate tissues were fixed in 10% formalin and paraffin-embedded or

snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Histopathological grading was performed

according to the classification of Park et al

[18]

. Immunohistochemical

staining was done as previously described

[19]

; images were captured

using an Olympus VS120 whole-slide scanning microscope. Levels of

steroids in serum were determined by extraction with hexane/

dichloromethane (3:2 v/v) followed by purification using a XEVO TQS

tandem mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) with a detection

limit of 10 pg/ml. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

(PCR) was carried out on RNA prepared using TRIzol reagent (Life

Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with a QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR kit

(Qiagen, Hilden, Germany)

[19]

. RNA sequencing was performed using a

MagMAX-96 total RNA isolation kit (Life Technologies) as previously

described

[19]

. Raw counts for RNA sequencing (RNAseq) data were

normalized and the variance was stabilized using the DESeq2 package

(Bioconductor) in R-studio 0.99.902, R v3.3.0.

2.2.

Patient cohorts

Patient specimens were obtained following protocols approved by the

institutional review board of Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM) and Fred

Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC). Two independent retro-

spective patient cohorts were used for training and testing/validation

( Table 1 )

. The WCM cohort (

n

= 9) included patients with clinically

localized PCa who had been receiving finasteride or dutasteride before

prostatectomy. The FHCRC cohort (

n

= 15) included samples collected as

part of the multicenter ARI40010 study

[20]

from patients who had

received dutasteride for 4 mo before prostatectomy. Immunohistochem-

istry was performed on paraffin-embedded tissues with a rabbit

polyclonal NKX3.1 antibody (Biocare Medical, Pacheco, CA, USA) using

a Leica Bond III automated stainer (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany),

and quantified using HALO software (Indica Labs, Corrales, NM, USA).

2.3.

Statistical analysis

Independent groups were compared using a two-tailed two-sample

Welch

t

test assuming that variances between the populations were not

equal. When two phenotypes were compared (

[16_TD$DIFF]

i.e., finasteride- vs

vehicle-treated samples), the Welch

t

test was applied to estimate the

difference in RNAseq counts (

[16_TD$DIFF]

i.e., differential expression) between these

phenotypes for each gene. Differential expression signatures were thus

defined as the list of genes ranked by

t

values from a two-tailed two-

sample

t

test comparing the finasteride- and vehicle-treated samples.

For comparison with human gene signatures, mouse genes were mapped

histopathological and expression profiling analyses. Cross-species computational anal-

ysis comparing finasteride-treated mice with two independent 5-ARI–treated patient

cohorts showed that reduced

NKX3.1

expression is predictive of response to 5-ARI. A

limitation of the study is that these retrospective human cohorts have relatively few

patients with limited clinical outcome data. Future prospective clinical trials are needed

to validate whether stratifying patients on the basis of

NKX3.1

expression improves the

benefit of 5-ARIs during active surveillance.

Conclusions:

This co-clinical study implicates

NKX3.1

status as a predictor of response to 5-

ARIs, and suggests that molecular features, including

NKX3.1

expression, may help to

identify PCa patients most likely to benefit from 5-ARIs during active surveillance.

Patient summary:

The aim of precision cancer prevention is to tailor interventions on the

basis of individualized patient characteristics. We propose that patients with low

NKX3.1

expression are optimal candidates for intervention with 5

a

-reductase inhibitors as an

adjunct to active surveillance.

#

2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 4 9 9 – 5 0 6

500