Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  497 656 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 497 656 Next Page
Page Background

reporting of this subpathology. The clinical utility of IDC is

arguably greater if incorporation of this pathological feature

into existing clinical models were to improve the prediction

of biochemical andmetastatic relapse. On the basis of recent

evidence from several large cohort studies, it can be

concluded that IDC is an independent prognostic factor

for recurrence, and even mortality

[2,5]

. IDC also frequently

coexists with another subpathology, cribriform architecture

(CA); both lesions are believed to have comparable

prognostic impact and independently improve on prognos-

tic stratification compared to the sole use of clinical indices

[5]

. However, it remains to be seen if IDC and CA are

predictive markers for the efficacy of treatment intensifica-

tion in the era of second-generation antiandrogen agents

(eg, enzalutamide, abiraterone) and taxane chemotherapy.

In their review, Porter et al note the persistence of IDC in

nearly 60% of tumor specimens following exposure to prior

androgen suppression or chemotherapy

[6]

. This is provoc-

ative, as it suggests that IDC is intrinsically resistant to

systemic therapies, and novel treatment intensification

protocols may be required to improve outcomes in patients

whose tumors harbor IDC-CA.

How do we begin to explain the biology underlying the

aggression associated with IDC-CA lesions? A recent study of

genomic profiling of matched primary-metastatic tumors

revealed a close relationship between tumor clones within

the metastases and the IDC subpathology, suggesting that

IDC may be the nidus of prometastatic tumor clones

[8] .

[(Fig._1)TD$FIG]

Fig. 1 – Molecular pathological hallmarks of intraductal carcinoma (IDC)–positive prostate cancer. (A) Histomorphology of IDC (labeled) as characterized

by a rim of basal cells (brown color) outlining the antecedent prostate duct, distended by carcinoma cells displaying a cribriform architecture. The

remaining glands (closed arrows) lacking basal cells are glandular adenocarcinoma. (B) Subclonal reconstruction of

BRCA2

-mutant (BR samples) and

sporadic (CPCG samples) prostate cancers from microdissected IDC and invasive carcinoma components. Both lesions originate from the same clonal

ancestry, with subsequent branching to multiple subspecies.

MED12L

amplification was predominant among

BRCA2

-mutant tumors; sporadic IDC-

positive tumors had a higher frequency of

PIK3CA

mutations compared to The Cancer Genome Atlas localized prostate cancer cohort

[9] .

Adapted from

Taylor et al

[9] .

CNA = copy number aberration.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 4 9 6 – 4 9 8

497