Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  540 656 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 540 656 Next Page
Page Background

biopsy is not negligible

[29]

. Apart from the costs related to

adverse events, there is also a potential cost linked to

imaging

[30,31]

. A change from AS to WWmay thus reduce

health care expenditure as there will be fewer follow-up

costs (eg, biopsies and related complications, imaging). Data

on the change from AS to WW will not only help in

estimating these costs, but also affect the validity of current

health evaluations of AS effectiveness, as patients need

information on the change from AS to WW to provide

accurate patient-reported outcome measures and experi-

ence measures for AS

[21] .

A major strength of our study is the use of comprehen-

sive data from PCBaSe

Traject

, a large, nationwide, popula-

tion-based database on PCa

[13]

. These data were used to

assess transition rates in the models for the changes

between different treatment options. Owing to the detailed

information available, we could adjust our estimations for

comorbidities and age, resulting in high internal validity.

The models are therefore reliable. Even though our results

were based on Swedish data only, we believe that the

external validity of our study is acceptable for other

populations with similar age-related rates of change in

CCI. A limitation of our study is the scarce data on follow-up

(eg, on repeat biopsies) as these are underreported in the

Patient Register, and lack of information on the actual

change from AS to WW for individual patients. Another

limitation is that follow-up was not long enough to

investigate causes of death for men with low-risk PCa on

AS. With longer follow-up, a future study including this

information could provide insight into whether AS was an

appropriate choice and whether the change to WW was

performed at the right time. Finally, it may be a limitation

that we assumed similar transition rates for WW to ADT and

AS to ADT for men of all ages, an assumption that cannot be

verified by our data. However, we evaluated the effects of

this assumption using different rates and noted very little

differences in the results.

5.

Conclusions

We estimated that changes from AS to WW become

more common in men with very low-risk PCa, especially

those who were elderly at the time of AS initiation. Our state

transition models estimated that a large proportion of

men with very low-risk PCa starting AS will change to

WW. These observations suggest that patients need to be

informed about this potential change before starting AS.

Moreover, the impact of the change to WW on allocation of

health care resources has probably been underestimated to

date (less follow-up expenditure on WW compared to AS)

and future guidelines on follow-up during AS should take

this into account.

Author contributions

:

Mieke Van Hemelrijck had full access to all the data in

the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the

accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design:

Adolfsson, Van Hemelrijck, Lindhagen, Garmo.

Acquisition of data:

Stattin, Garmo.

Analysis and interpretation of data:

Van Hemelrijck, Garmo, Lindhagen.

Drafting of the manuscript:

Van Hemelrijck.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content:

Lindhagen, Garmo, Adolfsson, Stattin, Bratt.

Statistical analysis:

Garmo, Lindhagen.

Obtaining funding:

Stattin, Adolfsson.

Administrative, technical, or material support:

Stattin.

Supervision:

Van Hemelrijck, Adolfsson.

Other:

None.

Financial disclosures:

Mieke Van Hemelrijck certifies that all conflicts of

interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and

affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the

manuscript (eg, employment/affiliation, grants or funding, consultan-

cies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties,

or patents filed, received, or pending), are the following: None.

Funding/Support and role of the sponsor:

This work was supported by the

Swedish Research Council for Working Life, Health, and Welfare (825-

2012-5047), the Swedish Cancer Society (14- 0570), the Cancer Society

of Stockholm, and Uppsala County Council. The sponsors played no

direct role in the study.

Acknowledgments:

This project was made possible by the continuous

work of the National PCa Register of Sweden (NPCR) steering group: Pa¨r

Stattin (chairman), Anders Widmark, Camilla Thellenberg Karlsson, Ove

Andre´n, Anna Bill-Axelson, Ann-Sofi Fransson, Magnus To¨rnblom, Stefan

Carlsson, Marie Hja¨lm Eriksson, David Robinson, Mats Ande´n, Jonas

Hugosson, Ingela Franck Lissbrant, Maria Nyberg, Go¨ran Ahlgren, Rene´

Blom, Lars Egevad, Calle Waller, Olof Akre, Per Fransson, Eva Johansson,

Fredrik Sandin, and Karin Hellstro¨m.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data associated with this article can be

found, in the online version, at

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. eururo.2016.10.031 .

References

[1]

Dall’Era MA, Albertsen PC, Bangma C, et al. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 2012;62:976–83.

[2]

Selvadurai ED, Singhera M, Thomas K, et al. Medium-term out- comes of active surveillance for localised prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2013;64:981–7.

[3]

Klotz L, Zhang L, Lam A, Nam R, Mamedov A, Loblaw A. Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:126–31.

[4]

Fall K, Garmo H, Andren O, et al. Prostate-specific antigen levels as a predictor of lethal prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99: 526–32

.

[5]

Heidenreich A, Bastian P, Bellmunt J, et al. Guidelines on prostate cancer. Arnhem, The Netherlands. European Association of Urology 2013.

[6]

Parker C. Active surveillance: towards a new paradigm in the management of early prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol 2004;5:101–6.

[7]

Steele G, Richie J. Management considerations for the patient with low-risk disease. In: Kantoff P, Carroll P, D’Amico AV, editors. Prostate cancer: principles and practice. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. p. 403.

[8]

Simpkin AJ, Tilling K, Martin RM, et al. Systematic review and meta- analysis of factors determining change to radical treatment in

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 5 3 4 – 5 4 1

540