Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  523 656 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 523 656 Next Page
Page Background

Screening with G8 has two principal aims: to decide if a

CGA is needed to identify reversible conditions that can be

addressed by geriatric interventions integrated into the

cancer treatment plan

[14,15]

; and to aid in choosing

appropriate prostate cancer treatment (see below).

2.2.

Cognitive screening

The task force considered that cognitive evaluation was

mandatory to assess the patient’s capacity to evaluate

information and make informed decisions. This represents

an addition to previous guidelines, and one that is likely to

assume increasing importance. A recent meta-analysis

compared the validity of cognitive screening tools

[16]

. The authors identified 102 studies that used the

Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). However, this is

time-consuming to complete. Of ten alternative tests, the

mini-COG

[4_TD$DIFF]

TM

[12]

had a diagnostic performance that most

closely matched that of the MMSE, and was chosen. A cutoff

point of 3/5 indicates a need to refer the patient for full

evaluation of potential dementia

( Table 2

).

2.3.

Simplified geriatric evaluation

Patients with an abnormal G8 score ( 14/17) should have a

simplified geriatric evaluation

( Table 3 )

. This consists of the

ADL measure of dependence, the CIRS-G to assess comor-

bidities, and weight loss as an indication of malnutrition.

This may determine firstly whether specific geriatric

interventions are needed, and secondly whether a full

CGA is required.

2.3.1.

Dependence

Dependence is typically evaluated using the ADL scale

[17,18]

. The presence of one ADL impairment—with the

exception of incontinence—is considered abnormal

[2] .

The

presence of more than two ADL impairments is unlikely to

be reversible.

2.3.2.

Comorbidities

The CISR-G

[11]

is a good tool for assessing the risk of non–

prostate cancer death

[2,11]

. The CIRS-G, which rates

nonfatal conditions according to their severity and degree of

control by treatment, is subjective but practical

[19]

. The

task force judged that geriatric interventions following a

CGA are likely to reverse grade 2 comorbidities. Single grade

3 comorbidities are generally irreversible, but need to be

individually evaluated. Grade 4 comorbidities are, by

definition, irreversible.

2.3.3.

Nutritional status

Malnutrition increases mortality in elderly patients

[20]

but, unless severe, may be reversible via geriatric interven-

tion. The task force decided to screen for malnutrition using

weight loss during the last three months. Good nutritional

status is defined as

<

5% loss; risk of malnutrition as loss

between 5% and 10%; and severe malnutrition as weight

loss

>

10%.

3.

Categorisation of patients and implications for

treatment

It is generally argued that candidates for definitive therapy

for localised prostate cancer should have a life expectancy of

10 yr. In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

(mCRPC) it is important to assess 2-yr and 5-yr survival.

Available tools can predict 1-yr or 5-yr survival for patients

living at home or in hospital or nursing home settings

[21]

,

but no classification or prognostic model based on health

status has been validated in urologic oncology. Recent

Table 1 – G8 screening tool

[5_TD$DIFF]

. According to 2014 Soubeyran et al.

[13]

A. Has food intake declined over the past 3 mo due to loss of appetite,

digestive problems, chewing, or swallowing difficulties?

Severe decrease in food intake

0

Moderate decrease in food intake

1

No decrease in food intake

2

B. Weight loss during the last 3 mo?

Weight loss

>

3 kg

0

Does not know

1

Weight loss 1–3 kg

2

No weight loss

3

C. Mobility

Bed- or chair-bound

0

Able to get out of bed/chair but does not go out

1

Goes out

2

D. Neuropsychological problems?

Severe depression or dementia

0

Mild dementia

1

No psychological problems

2

E. Body mass index (BMI)?

BMI

<

19 kg/m

2

0

BMI 19 to

<

21 kg/m

2

1

BMI 21 to

<

23 kg/m

2

2

BMI 23 kg/m

2

3

F. Takes more than 3 prescription drugs per day?

Yes

0

No

1

G. In comparison to other people of the same age, how does the

patient consider his health status?

Not as good

0

Does not know

0.5

As good

1

Better

2

H. Age

86 yr

0

80–85 yr

1

<

80 yr

2

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 5 2 1 – 5 3 1

523