Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  644 656 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 644 656 Next Page
Page Background

clinical variables, including tumor pathology grade, stage,

and local or any recurrence

( Fig. 3 , Table 2

, and Supplemen-

tary Fig. 7). A Kaplan-Meier plot showed a separation in the

overall survival rate between samples belonging to different

subtypes, but this was not statistically significant, probably

because of the low sample/event numbers

( Fig. 3 )

.

Comparing our data set to TCGA data revealed that UTUC

cluster 2 was the most similar to the TCGA basal-like cluster

(Supplementary Fig. 8A). Analysis of individual TCGA

bladder cancer basal and luminal markers revealed signifi-

cant differences between clusters 1 and 2, with higher

expression of basal markers in cluster 2 (KRT4 and TP63)

and higher expression of a luminal marker in cluster 1

(UPK2)

[7]

(Supplementary Fig. 8B).

Each of the four subtypes had unique molecular and

clinical features. Cluster 1 had no

PIK3CA

mutations;

was enriched for non-smokers, high-grade non–muscle-

invasive tumors, and high recurrence rates; and had

favorable survival. Cluster 2, with 100%

FGFR3

mutations,

was enriched for low-grade, noninvasive disease, and had no

bladder recurrences. Cluster 3 also had 100%

FGFR3

mutations; 71%

PIK3CA

and no

TP53

mutations; and had

high tobacco use and bladder recurrence. The tumors were

all non–muscle-invasive. Cluster 4 had

KMT2D

(62.5%),

FGFR3

(50%), and

TP53

(50%) mutations, but no

PIK3CA

mutations;

and was enriched for high-grade, muscle-invasive disease,

tobacco use, carcinoma in situ, and shorter survival. A novel

SH3KBP1-CNTNAP5

fusion was identified in this cluster

(Section

3.5 )

, with high expression levels in the sample.

CTLA4, CD274 (PDL1) and PDCD1 (PD1) have recently

been established as effective targets of immunotherapy in

some cancers

[8,24]

. We observed higher mRNA expression

levels of all three genes in 17% of all patients (5/28);

however, they were upregulated in nearly half of the cluster

4 samples (4/9) but not any in of the cluster 3 samples

( Fig. 3 )

.

[(Fig._1)TD$FIG]

Fig. 1 – Oncoplot of genomic alterations in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The most frequently altered genes in 25 of 27 patients (somatic

mutations in the hypermutator samples were excluded when determining top altered genes) are represented, along with the top mutated genes in

UTUC in previous reports

[11] .

Mutations with at least ten reports in COSMIC

[32]

are considered recurrent (dark green and black).

TERT

promoter

mutations were detected in two of the five samples for which we obtained sufficient sequence coverage for the

TERT

promoter, and are not shown

here. The somatic mutation rates are represented by barplots (total number of silent and nonsilent mutations per Mb covered by

I

20 reads). Selected

patient/sample clinical features are represented in top tracks. Synch BLCA = synchronous bladder cancer.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 6 4 1 – 6 4 9

644