590 656
[9] NHS England, Acute Care Policy and Strategy Unit03. MeshWorking
Group Interim Report Superseded, 2015.
https://www.england.nhs. uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/mesh-wg-interim-rep.pdf .[10] Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health
Risks (SCENIHR). Opinion on: The safety of surgical meshes used
in urogynecological surgery, 2015.
http://ec.europa.eu/health/ scientific_committees/consultations/public_consultations/ scenihr_consultation_27_en.htm .[11] OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. The Oxford 2011 Levels
of Evidence. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.
http:// www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653.
[12]
Jadad AR. Randomised controlled trials. London, UK: BMJ Publish- ing Group; 1998.
[13]
Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M. Publication bias in meta- analysis: prevention, assessment and adjustment. Chichester, UK: John Wiley; 2005.[14]
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097.
[15]
Bandarian M, Ghanbari Z, Asgari A. Comparison of transobturator tape (TOT) vs Burch method in treatment of stress urinary inconti- nence. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;31:518–20.[16]
Valpas A, Ala-Nissila¨ S, Tomas E, Nilsson CG. TVT versus laparo- scopic mesh colposuspension: 5-year follow-up results of a ran- domized clinical trial. Int Urogynecol J 2015;26:57–63.
[17]
Wadie BS, Mansour A, El-Hefnawy AS, Nabeeh A, Khair AA. Mini- mum 2-year follow-up of mid-urethral slings, effect on quality of life, incontinence impact and sexual function. Int Urogynecol J 2010;21:1485–90.
[18]
Al-Azzawi IS. The first Iraqi experience with the rectus fascia sling and transobturator tape for female stress incontinence: a random- ised trial. Arab J Urol 2014;12:204–8.[19]
Khan ZA, Nambiar A, Morley R, Chapple CR, Emery SJ, Lucas MG. Long-term follow-up of a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing tension-free vaginal tape, xenograft and autologous fascial slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. BJU Int 2015;115:968–77.
[20]
Lee KS, Han DH, Choi YS, et al. A prospective trial comparing tension- free vaginal tape and transobturator vaginal tape inside-out for the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: 1-Year follow-up. J Urol 2007;177:214–8.
[21]
Angioli R, Plotti F, Muzii L, Montera R, Panici PB, Zullo MA. Tension- free vaginal tape versus transobturator suburethral tape: five-year follow-up results of a prospective, randomised trial. Eur Urol 2010;58:671–7.
[22]
Deffieux X, Daher N, Mansoor A, Debodinance P, Muhlstein J, Fernandez H. Transobturator TVT-O versus retropubic TVT: results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial at 24 months follow- up. Int Urogynecol J 2010;21:1337–45.
[23]
El-Hefnawy AS, Wadie BS, El Mekresh M, Nabeeh A, BazeedMA. TOT for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: how should we assess its equivalence with TVT? Int Urogynecol J 2010;21:947–53.[24]
Krofta L, Feyereisl J, Otcena´sek M, Velebil P, Kası´kova´ E, Krcma´r M. TVT and TVT-O for surgical treatment of primary stress urinary incontinence: prospective randomized trial. Int Urogynecol J 2010;21:141–8.
[25]
Palva K, Rinne K, Aukee P, et al. A randomized trial comparing tension-free vaginal tape with tension-free vaginal tape-obturator: 36-month results. Int Urogynecol J 2010;21:1049–55.
[26]
Tanuri AL, Feldner Jr PC, Bella ZI, Castro RA, Sartori MG, Gira˜o MJ. Retropubic or transobturator slings for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2010;56:348–54.[27]
Freeman R, Holmes D, Hillard T, et al. What patients think: patient-reported outcomes of retropubic versus trans-obturator mid-urethral slings for urodynamic stress incontinence–a multi- centre randomised controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22: 279–86.[28]
Teo R, Moran P, Mayne C, Tincello D. Randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and tension-free vaginal tape-obturator for urodynamic stress incontinence in women. J Urol 2011;185:1350–5.
[29]
Albo ME, Litman HJ, Richter HE, et al. Treatment success of retro- pubic and transobturator mid urethral slings at 24 months. J Urol 2012;188:2281–7.[30]
Ballester M, Bui C, Frobert JL, et al. Four-year functional results of the suburethral sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence: a French prospective randomized multicentre study comparing the retropubic and transobturator routes. World J Urol 2012;30: 117–22.
[31]
Schierlitz L, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, et al. Three-year follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape compared with transobturator tape in women with stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:321–7.
[32]
Wadie BS, El-Hefnawy AS. TVT versus TOT, 2-year prospective randomized study. World J Urol 2013;31:645–9.[33]
Aigmu¨ ller T, Tammaa A, Tamussino K, et al. Retropubic vs. trans- obturator tension-free vaginal tape for female stress urinary incon- tinence: 3-month results of a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J 2014;25:1023–30.[34]
Laurikainen E, Valpas A, Aukee P, et al. Five-year results of a randomized trial comparing retropubic and transobturator midur- ethral slings for stress incontinence. Eur Urol 2014;65:1109–14.
[35]
Shirvan MK, Rahimi HR, Mahboub MRD, Sheikhi Z. Tension-free vaginal tape versus transobturator tape for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: A comparative randomized clinical trial study. Urol Sci 2014;25:54–7.
[36]
Tarcan T, Mangir N, Sahan A, Tanidir Y, Sulukaya M, I˙ lker Y. Safety and efficacy of retropubic or transobturator midurethral slings in a randomized cohort of Turkish women. Urol Int 2014;93:449–53.[37]
Costantini E, Kocjancic E, Lazzeri M, et al. Long-term efficacy of the trans-obturator and retropubic mid-urethral slings for stress uri- nary incontinence: update from a randomized clinical trial. World J Urol 2016;34:585–93.
[38]
Ross S, Tang S, Eliasziw M, et al. Transobturator tape versus retro- pubic tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence: 5-year safety and effectiveness outcomes following a randomised trial. Int Urogynecol J 2016;27:879–86.
[39]
Zhang Z, Zhu L, Xu T, Lang J. Retropubic tension-free vaginal tape and inside-out transobturator tape: a long-term randomized trial. Int Urogynecol J 2016;27:103–11.
[40]
Chen Z, Chen Y, Du GH, et al. Comparison of three kinds of mid- urethral slings for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Urologia 2010;77:37–41.
[41]
Scheiner DA, Betschart C, Wiederkehr S, Seifert B, Fink D, Perucchini D. Twelve months effect on voiding function of retropubic com- pared with outside-in and inside-out transobturator midurethral slings. Int Urogynecol J 2012;23:197–206.
[42]
Abdel-Fattah M, Ramsay I, Pringle S, et al. Randomised prospective single-blinded study comparing ‘‘inside-out’’ versus ‘‘outside-in’’ transobturator tapes in the management of urodynamic stress incontinence: 1-year outcomes from the E-TOT study. BJOG 2010;117:870–8.
[43]
Abdel-Fattah M, Mostafa A, Familusi A, Ramsay I, N’dow J. Prospec- tive randomised controlled trial of transobturator tapes in man- agement of urodynamic stress incontinence in women: 3-year outcomes from the Evaluation of Transobturator Tapes study. Eur Urol 2012;62:843–51.
[44]
Park YJ, Kim DY. Randomized controlled study of MONARC 1 vs. tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O 1 ) in the treatment ofE U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 5 6 7 – 5 9 1
590