Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  655 656 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 655 656 Next Page
Page Background

[3]

Rosenkrantz AB, Verma S, Choyke P, et al. Prostate magnetic reso- nance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in patients with a prior negative biopsy: a consensus statement by AUA and SAR. J Urol 2016;196:1613–8

.

[4]

Moldovan PC, Van den Broeck T, Sylvester R, et al. What is the negative predictive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in excluding prostate cancer at biopsy? A systematic review and meta-analysis from the European Association of Urolo- gy Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol 2017;72:250–66.

[5]

Tosoian JJ, Druskin SC, Andreas D, et al. Use of the Prostate Health Index for detection of prostate cancer: results from a large academic practice. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2017;20:228–33

.

Stacy Loeb

*

Department of Urology and Population Health,

New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs,

New York, NY, USA

*

[2_TD$DIFF]

227

[3_TD$DIFF]

E30

[4_TD$DIFF]

St

[5_TD$DIFF]

(#612), New York, NY

[6_TD$DIFF]

100016, USA.

E-mail address:

stacyloeb@gmail.com . http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.06.016

#

2017 European Association of Urology.

Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 6 5 0 – 6 5 5

655