Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  652 656 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 652 656 Next Page
Page Background and sensitivity versus DNA next generation sequencing testing for urinary tract infections. J Urol 2017;197:e603.

Truls E.

[1_TD$DIFF]

Bjerklund

[3_TD$DIFF]

Johansen

a,

*

, Tommaso Cai

b

a

Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo,

Oslo, Norway

b

Department of Urology, Santa Chiara Regional Hospital, Trento, Italy

*Corresponding author. Oslo University Hospital, Department of

Urology, Trondheimsveien 235, Nydalen, Oslo 4959, Norway.

E-mail addresses:

tebj@medisin.uio.no , tebj@clin.au.dk

(T.E.

[1_TD$DIFF]

Bjerklund

[3_TD$DIFF]

Johansen).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.05.043

#

2017 European Association of Urology.

Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Re: Treatment Duration of Febrile Urinary Tract

Infection: A Pragmatic Randomized, Double-blind,

Placebo-controlled Non-inferiority Trial in Men and

Women

Van Nieuwkoop C, van der Starre WE, Stalenhoef JE, et al

BMC Med 2017;15:70

Expert’s summary:

The authors compared treatment of febrile urinary tract in-

fection (fUTI) with ciprofloxacin in women and men for 7 or

14 d. The primary endpoint was the clinical cure rate (CCr) at

10–18 d after treatment. The authors demonstrate that a 7-d

course was not inferior to 14-d treatment in women (CCr 94%

vs 93%), but was inferior in men (CCr 86% vs 98%).

Expert’s comments:

The results confirm those of previous trials of fUTI (eg, pyelo-

nephritis) in women who were successfully treated with a 7-d

ciprofloxacin course

[1]

. By contrast, men seem to require 14 d

of ciprofloxacin to reach the same CCr level. This is consistent

with findings in a Swedish study showing that 2-wk treatment

for fUTI in men was not inferior to 4 wk

[2]

. In the latter study,

[6_TD$DIFF]

transient raised PSA and significant swelling of the prostate on

transrectal ultrasound volumemeasurement

[7_TD$DIFF]

indicated that the

prostate gland was involved in almost all male fUTIs, regardless

of clinical presentation. This observation is a possible explana-

tion for the longer antimicrobial regimen required in men.

The term fUTI is useful, since elderly patients, men, and

urological patients often lack characteristic symptoms and

signs of acute pyelonephritis. A pragmatic definition of fUTI

is temperature elevation to 38.0

8

C accompanying general

symptoms such as shivering, rigor, and nausea, together

with one or several UTI symptoms. Dipstick-positive

nitrite and leukocyte esterase tests support the diagnosis.

Leukocytosis and elevated C-reactive protein in serum

suggest involvement of the kidney and/or prostate.

Consequently, the two statements that 7-d treatment for

women and 14-d treatment for men with ciprofloxacin

directed against a susceptible strain strengthen the

evidence level for guidelines providers. The European

Association of Urology guideline on urological infections

states that all UTIs in men are complicated UTIs, but does

not clearly differentiate between nonfebrile UTI and fUTI

[3]

. With the present study and its supporting references in

mind, it would be reasonable to reflect on useful definitions,

terminology, and clinical reality in recommending antimi-

crobial treatment for different UTI presentations.

In view of the scarce number of antibiotics suitable for

the

[8_TD$DIFF]

urinary

[9_TD$DIFF]

and genital tracts, especially in men, and the

global increase in resistance against theses antimicrobials,

the threat is obvious. Parsimonious use, adherence to

evidence-based guideline recommendations, and the de-

velopment of new antibiotics and alternative infection

management methods are imperative for future patient

safety. Health authorities have a clear role in promoting this

development.

Conflicts of interest:

The author has nothing to disclose.

References

[1]

Sandberg T, et al. Lancet 2012;380:484–90.

[2]

Ulleryd P. Scand J Infect Dis 2003;35:34–9.

[3] European Association of Urology. Guidelines on urological infec-

tions 2017.

http://uroweb.org/guideline/urological-infections .

Magnus J. Grabe

*

Urology Department,

[1_TD$DIFF]

Ska˚ne

[2_TD$DIFF]

University

[3_TD$DIFF]

Hospital,

[4_TD$DIFF]

Malmo¨, Sweden

*Urology Department,

[1_TD$DIFF]

Ska˚ ne

[2_TD$DIFF]

University

[3_TD$DIFF]

Hospital,

[4_TD$DIFF]

Malmo¨, Sweden.

E-mail address:

magnus.grabe@med.lu.se . http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.05.042

#

2017 European Association of Urology.

Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Re: The Economic Implications of a Reusable Flexible

Digital Ureteroscope: A Cost-Benefit Analysis

Martin CJ, McAdams SB, Abdul-Muhsin H, et al

J Urol 2017;197:730–5

Experts’ summary:

The authors performed a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and cal-

culated the benefit-to-cost ratio (BCR) to evaluate the potential

economic benefits of a single-use flexible digital ureteroscope

(LithoVue; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) compared

to a conventional reusable flexible digital ureteroscope (Flex

X

c

[2_TD$DIFF]

; Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany). The data were collected in

a prospective manner and cases being operated on with a

reusable flexible digital ureteroscope were included. Cost as-

sessment of the reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes per case

was performed using original purchasing and repair/exchange

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 6 5 0 – 6 5 5

652